Mastering Attachment Styles: Unlocking Secure Relationship

Ever wonder why you connect with some people easier than others?

Live Class and Recordings

Beyond Attachment Styles: A Foundational Course in Attachment Repair

Learning Objectives of the Attachment Course:

  1. Understand the origins of attachment theory and its historical context.

  2. Explain key developments by John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth, including their contributions to infant and adult attachment.

  3. Gain insight into major attachment styles (secure, avoidant, ambivalent, and disorganized) and their impacts.

  4. Explore the Strange Situation protocol and the Adult Attachment Interview as gold standards in assessing attachment.

  5. Identify common misunderstandings in attachment theory and correct them with evidence-based perspectives.

  6. Develop foundational knowledge of attachment dynamics for use in professional or personal growth.

Challenges of Attachment Theory:

Attachment theory is widely misunderstood. Many people have inaccurate ideas about attachment styles and strategies. This course aims to provide a clear framework for understanding attachment.

Common Misunderstandings:

  • Despite the popularity of attachment theory, many people (both professionals and laypeople) misunderstand its core concepts. Misconceptions are rife, especially regarding attachment strategies and their application.

  • This attachment course intends to provide clarity, offering a foundational understanding of the theory as a starting point.

Key Figures in Attachment Theory:

  • John Bowlby: Originator of attachment theory. Studied the effects of child separation on mental health.

  • Mary Ainsworth: Conducted the Strange Situation to assess infant attachment.

  • Mary Main: Developed the Adult Attachment Interview to assess adult attachment styles.

The Strange Situation (Ainsworth’s Protocol):

  • The Strange Situation is an observational protocol developed by Ainsworth to assess infant-caregiver relationships. It involves structured separations and reunions to evaluate the infant’s expectations and responses to the caregiver's presence and absence.

  • Ainsworth's key finding was that maternal sensitivity directly correlated with attachment outcomes. Infants with sensitive caregivers were more likely to explore and play while also seeking comfort when distressed.

  • Contradicting Early Behavioral Theories:

    • Early behaviorists believed that responding to a child’s needs would reinforce clingy or fussy behavior. However, Ainsworth’s research showed the opposite: infants whose needs were promptly and sensitively met were more securely attached, more independent, and exploratory.

Adult Attachment Interview

Mary Main’s Adult Attachment Interview (AAI)

  • How the AAI assesses underlying attachment strategies through language and storytelling

  • The connection between caregiver care and attachment strategies in adulthood

  • Objective: Understand adult attachment and its assessment through the Adult Attachment Interview.

The Misuse of Attachment Theory in Popular Culture

  • The rise of online self-report quizzes (e.g., the ECR Scale) and their limited accuracy

  • The difference between clinical assessments and pop psychology interpretations

  • Objective: Differentiate between evidence-based assessments of attachment and self-reports.

Ainsworth's Research Contributions

  • Mary Ainsworth’s ethnographic studies in Uganda and introduction of the Strange Situation protocol

  • The role of a “secure base” in child exploration

  • The Strange Situation experiment and how attachment styles manifest in child behavior

  • Objective: Teach participants how attachment is measured in infants and its implications for caregiving.

Sensitivity and Attachment Outcomes

  • Secure, avoidant, ambivalent, and disorganized attachment styles

  • Common distortions of attachment concepts in popular media

  • The significance of maternal sensitivity in attachment outcomes

  1. Objective: Help participants understand the different attachment strategies and correct common misconceptions.

The Strange Situation Procedure

  • The Strange Situation evaluates whether an infant uses their caregiver as a secure base from which to explore their environment and as a haven of safety when distressed.

  • The procedure examines the infant’s balance between exploration when the caregiver is present and seeking comfort when distressed.

Attachment and the Environment

  • Attachment theory posits that the environment, particularly the caregiving environment, plays a critical role in shaping a child's attachment patterns.

  • Stressors like poverty, trauma, family conflict, and instability in the caregiving environment can negatively affect attachment security.

  • Some cultures emphasize independence and self-reliance, fostering more avoidant attachment behaviors, while others prioritize closeness and interdependence, fostering more secure or ambivalent attachment styles.

Attachment Style Course Structure

This course, "Attachment and the Environment," is a live, 6-week program. Participants will meet once a week for 90-minute live sessions that include lectures, discussions, and interactive activities. Each session focuses on key topics related to how environmental factors influence attachment development, with time for Q&A and group collaboration.

Class Logistics:

  • Duration: 6 weeks

  • Class Meetings: Once per week, 90 minutes per session

  • Format: Live online sessions via Zoom video conference

  • Materials: Pre-session readings, live discussions, and case studies

  • Interactive Components: Group discussions, Q&A, and real-time feedback

  • Final Project: Case study analysis to apply course concepts

Four primary attachment styles—Secure, Anxious, Avoidant, and Disorganized—mapped along two axes: Anxiety and Avoidance. The vertical axis represents the Model of Self as it relates to anxiety, ranging from a positive (low anxiety) to a negative (high anxiety) self-view. The horizontal axis represents the Model of Others, based on avoidance, spanning from a positive (low avoidance) to a negative (high avoidance) view of others.

Attachment Styles:

1. Secure: Characterized by a positive view of self and others, individuals with a secure attachment value intimacy, experience low anxiety, and engage in balanced, trusting relationships. 

2.Anxious: Marked by a negative self-view, high need for closeness, and high anxiety, individuals with an anxious attachment are driven by a need for reassurance but often feel insecure in relationships. They chronically worry about rejection and feel preoccupied with relationships.

3. Avoidant: With a positive self-view but distrust in others, avoidant individuals maintain emotional distance, are low in anxiety, but display high avoidance in relationships. They value self-reliance and achievement. 

4. Disorganized: Reflecting a negative view of both self and others, individuals with a disorganized attachment style struggle with intimacy due to terror, displaying both high anxiety and high avoidance. Marked by intense conflicting emotions, fight-or-flight activation, and sometimes dissociation.

*This attachment course will delve deeper into these topics and explore methods for developing secure attachment patterns.

Start Course Continue Course Retake Course Preview Course Learn More
Retake this course?
Retaking this course from the beginning will reset all of your tracked progress.
Retake

Dive into key developments in attachment theory, learn about crucial assessments like the Strange Situation and the Adult Attachment Interview

This course will provide a clear and foundational understanding of attachment conditioning

Join us as we unravel the complexities of attachment styles and their impact on infant and adult relationships.